Life on the Road - Trucking News Blog

Mexican Kenworth T660 on the free road between Nuevo Laredo and Monterrey is typical of Mexican line haul trucks in operation on Mexican highways today. Gone or the days of what could be perceived as

The days after the one year mark of the Mexican Cross Border Program, and exactly one year to the day that the first truck crossed the border to inaugerate the program, the House of Representatives, by a vote of 395-18 voted to end the controversial Mexican Cross Border Program.

For one year, these 100 trucks have operated safely with ZERO accidents and ZERO serious safety issues further reinforcing the statistics that show Mexican carriers have a lower OOS rate than their counterparts. The past year proved that Mexican carriers can operate under our laws and regulations, do so safely and with no impact on American trucking jobs or economics.

But this is not enough to satisfy those such as Jimmy Hoffa, President of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Despite evidence to the contrary, he still cannot utter the words, “Mexican Trucks” without putting “dangerous”, “unsafe” or “illegal” as a preface.

So Hoffa and his protectionists allies in Congress have won a battle but the war still rages. There is a continuing groundswell of support from mainstream media outlets, and business groups such as National Association of Manufacturers who quit out of character for them, came out and told it like others are afraid to do. Treaties? Trade Agreements? We’ll Violate Them with Impunity Tough talk but brutally honest.

The US Chamber of Commerce issued a “key vote” letter to lawmakers urging them to reject the bill. A “key vote’ letter is indicative of the seriousness of the issue and shows intent to place the members votes on a voters scorecard.

Retaliation Expected
As I am writing this, the a statement was released by the Mexican Embassy in Washington.

“Mexico has fulfilled its NAFTA obligations and expects the U.S. do the same. Should the bill be enacted into law, the government of Mexico will consider taking all the appropriate actions, including remedies or countermeasures under the North American Free Trade Agreement,” the embassy statement said.

As well they should and they have every right to do so.

Sadly, this demonstrates not the “will of the people” of is suppose to be the reason Congress exists, but the “will of special interests”.

Over the past year, I’ve had conversations in truck stops, over the CB radio, will American truckers. Most could care less about the Mexican trucks. The overwhelming opinion is if they play by the rules, they don’t have a problem.

I’ve run with other truckers on the highway and passing one of these Pilot Program participants, asking my running buddies what they thought about that “dangerous Mexican truck” we had just passed. They could not tell the Mexican truck from any others.

The truth is, this program has not effected any one of us in this industry nor in this country. Nor can it. The numbers just don’t add up.

More of my thoughts on my website where I can be my usual lovable, logical self.

And after a long dry spell, I have returned!

After months of hype smear campaigns by the plaintiffs, the lawsuit against FMCSA over the cross border program was heard by a three Judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Tuesday, February 12.

Some of the issues raised, included the parties “standing” in the action, the legality of continuing the program in view of the flawed amendment inserted into the Omnibus spending bill signed by President Bush in December and the statistical validity of the results with so few participants.

Out of the gate, the attorney representing Teamsters, Public Citizen and Sierra Club was asked by one of the Jurists, why and for what reason was Sierra Club a party to this action for which he become slightly combative with the Judge and had no good explanation for their presence. It was suggested they were merely a party to share in attorney fees should the plaintiff’s prevail.

Read the rest of this entry »

Nope, I don’t have a crystal ball and my record of predicting the future is anything but stellar; just a quick look at my buy and sell choices in the stock market, over the last 20 years, would leave you convinced that the title of this post is dripping with audacity. That’s why it’s couched as a question rather than a statement. You’ll do well to consider my assertions, read the source material, and come to your own conclusions.

I just finished reading a very interesting post by Dan Goodwill titled “NASCO (North America’s Super Corridor Coalition)” and it got me to thinking. First, a little background so you know where I’m going with this. Back in October I authored a post in which the issue of some new regulations being proposed for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach were thoroughly inspected. Well, as thoroughly inspected as possible in a blog post. The entry didn’t seem to generate much interest, maybe very few folks figured it would impact them directly, so I didn’t bother following up with a post when the regulations were adopted in early December or when the new container fees were approved about ten days later. Read the rest of this entry »

President Bush signed the $555 Omnibus Spending bill despite misgivings about the record 9000 special earmarks included. Included in the bill was a small paragraph that opponents of the program celebrated as the end to the cross border program.

Moments later, FMCSA issued a press release making known their intent to carry forward with program.

FMCSA made it clear they were following the wording of the amendment which stated:

Read the rest of this entry »

We haven’t touched on this subject for awhile and since it seems the opponent and others are beginning to throw around their distorted version of events, perhaps it’s time we revisit the subject.
Read the rest of this entry »

On November 14, the house approved the Transportation spending bill with Amendment 624 intact.

For those not familiar, Amendment 624 is the attempt to stop funding for the Mexican truck program.

For now, the bill is not expected to go to the Senate for vote until they return from the Thanksgiving recess. If passed, it would go to the President for his promised veto, which I support fully. Action on this bill probably would not occur until after Congress resumes in 2008. At this point, the Mexican truck program, consisting of 7 Mexican carriers with a total of 44 trucks, and 4 US companies operating a total of 41 trucks in Mexico will have been in existence for almost 6 months, operating safely and without complaint.
Read the rest of this entry »

How stupid do people think we are?

Coming off a peaceful and productive weekend, I was surprised (well, not really) to see where one of my spiders had come up with this piece of gutter journalism. Feds outsource Mexican truck safety - Trilateral trade association becomes chief inspector.

I was less surprised to see some of the smear sites quickly pick up on it and run it front page.

Has it gotten down to this? The opponents of the Mexican Demonstration Program have exhausted all manners of rhetoric and need to resort to destroying a well established safety group? Apparently so.

Read the rest of this entry »

The opponents and most vocal critics of the Mexican Pilot Program continue to insist their opposition is only about safety and concern over the economic impact a few Mexican trucks will have on their ability to earn a decent living. Facts and figures would suggest otherwise.

Thursday, October 4, a small group of Mexican truckers gathered at the Matamoros-Brownsville International bridge to protest Mexico’s participation in the Demonstration Program

Read the rest of this entry »

This little item just came across my news feed followed by a notice from Melissa at FMCSA, and boys and girls, they done slipped one past us!

FMCSA to Initiate Real-Time Tracking for Mexican and U.S. Trucks Participating in the Cross-Border Trucking Demonstration Project
Tracking system would monitor hours of service, cabotage and vehicle position

Ya’ll know what this means don’t you? They kill two or three canaries with one stone.

Read the rest of this entry »

Given the controversy surrounding the Mexican Truck Issue and the recent strike by GM workers I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately about the Abundance vs. Scarcity Mentality Model as I was introduced to it by Stephen Covey; the author of “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People“. I think it’s best to let him explain in his own words:

“Most people are deeply scripted in what I call the Scarcity Mentality. They see life as having only so much, as though there were only one pie out there. And if someone were to get a big piece of the pie, it would mean less for everybody else.
“The Scarcity Mentality is the zero-sum paradigm of life. People with a Scarcity Mentality have a very difficult time sharing recognition and credit, power or profit – even with those who help in the production. They also have a a very hard time being genuinely happy for the success of other people.
“The Abundance Mentality, on the other hand, flows out of a deep inner sense of personal worth and security. It is the paradigm that there is plenty out there and enough to spare for everybody. It results in sharing of prestige, of recognition, of profits, of decision making. It opens possibilities, options, alternatives, and creativity.”

Now, I’m quite sure it’ll take me quite awhile, if ever, to completely reconcile this concept with the trucking industry but I do have a few thoughts on the subject; open to criticism. Read the rest of this entry »